Struct DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput 

#[non_exhaustive]
pub struct DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput {
    pub statement_id: Option<String>,
    pub client_token: Option<String>,
}

Input for DeleteResourcePermissionStatement operation

Fields (Non-exhaustive)

Non-exhaustive structs could have additional fields added in future. Therefore, non-exhaustive structs cannot be constructed in external crates using the traditional Struct { .. } syntax; cannot be matched against without a wildcard ..; and struct update syntax will not work.

statement_id: Option<String>

Unique identifier of the permission statement to delete

client_token: Option<String>

Idempotency token for the request

Implementations

impl DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput

pub fn statement_id(&self) -> Option<&str>

Unique identifier of the permission statement to delete

pub fn client_token(&self) -> Option<&str>

Idempotency token for the request

impl DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput

pub fn builder() -> DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInputBuilder

Creates a new builder-style object to manufacture DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput.

Trait Implementations

impl Clone for DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput

fn clone(&self) -> DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput

Returns a duplicate of the value.

fn clone_from(&mut self, source: &Self)

Performs copy-assignment from source.

impl Debug for DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput

fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> Result

Formats the value using the given formatter.

impl PartialEq for DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput

fn eq(&self, other: &DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput) -> bool

Tests for self and other values to be equal, and is used by ==.

fn ne(&self, other: &Rhs) -> bool

Tests for !=. The default implementation is almost always sufficient, and should not be overridden without very good reason.

impl StructuralPartialEq for DeleteResourcePermissionStatementInput